Hot off the press is new research titled “Space as a Resource in the Politics of Consumer Identity” by Andre F. Maciel (University of Nebraska–Lincoln) and Melanie Wallendorf (University of Arizona). This research is published in the Journal of Consumer Research.

See below for a summary of the article. Congrats to these scholars on their publication!

Crafting a Way Forward: Identity Politics in Everyday Life

A keystone of contemporary culture is the availability of a wide range of consumer identities: ways of being that are socially recognized as having distinct histories, goals, and typical activities. However, not all consumer identities are created equal, so to speak. Many identities are seen as prestigious (e.g., being a cosmopolitan shopper) or taken as normal (e.g., being a football fan). At the same time, some identities are demeaned, usually for being linked to devalued groups in key social categories such as gender, race, class, and age. 

In this paper, we focus on how consumers with devalued identities set out to contest this devaluation, engaging in the cultural dynamic called the “politics of consumer identity.” The method is an ethnography of the politics of consumer identity that has emerged from contemporary knitting. Often dismissed as backward and dull in the larger culture, knitting has nonetheless become a favored hobby for millions of US women in the last two decades, following Martha Stewart’s remarkable success in promoting domesticity as a valuable skill. In fact, knitting’s revival has led magazines as diverse as The Economist and Parade to run stories on knitting. This renewed interest in knitting has attracted mostly college-educated women in conventional middle-class jobs and social relations. We studied a sample of these women through multiple methods: participant-observation in a knitting store, interviews, online observation, survey, and media analysis.

From our dataset, we abstract the market conditions that facilitate the politicization of consumer identities. These conditions involve empowering discourses that provide consumers with the impetus to reimagine the meaning of their identities; they also involve empowering objects that materialize this reimagined meaning. Consumers use these discourses and objects to reconceive their relationship with their devalued identities.

Moreover, we use our data to conceptualize how consumers articulate their empowered identities to various social actors, from their kin to strangers. At home, they claim specific spaces to clearly signal the value they expect intimate others to grant their consumer identities. These spaces work like small territories, where consumers can express their pride and commitment to this identity. In public, consumers take their devalued identities to spaces where it is highly visible to others. They build visibility in ways that destabilize negative stereotypes associated with it, at least temporarily. And for both private and public situations, we find that retail stores and consumption websites play an important role. These spaces enable consumers to come together to support each other in their domestic negotiations and mobilize for their public outings. For example, knitting shops played a critical role for the organization of the Women’s March in 2017. These shops directly supported the making of thousands of pussyhats, the pink knitted hat that became the symbol of that protest.

Broadly, our findings illuminate how consumers participate in the politics of identity without becoming activists or joining radical social movements, but rather by weaving identity politics into their routines and other responsibilities. In an era when identity politics is so often dramatic, marked by contentious debates in media and public protests, it may be easy to overlook the kind of politics that shapes everyday life. Highlighting this form of politics is nonetheless essential to understand how cultural change can be negotiated and accomplished through consumption.

Leave a Reply